Rabbi
Doniel Staum, LMSW
Rabbi,
Kehillat New Hempstead
Social
Worker, Yeshiva Bais Hachinuch
STAM
TORAH
PARSHAS PEKUDEI
5776
“FORGE ON”
“There is a
cemetery not far from my house, with graves that date back to the nineteenth
century. I have never seen anyone come there to lay a flower. Most people just
wander through, read the engravings and say, “Wow. Look how old.”
“That cemetery came to mind in the Rabbi’s office,
after he quoted a poem both beautiful and heartbreaking. Written by Thomas
Hardy, it told of a man among tombstones, conversing with the dead below. The
recently buried souls lamented the older souls that had already been forgotten:
They count as quite forgot
They are as men that have existed not
Theirs is a loss past loss of pitiful breath
It is the second death.
“The second death. The unvisited in the
nursing homes. The homeless found frozen in the alleys. Who mourned their
passing? Who marked their time on earth?
“Once on a trip to Russia ,” the Rabbi recalled, “we
found an old Orthodox synagogue. Inside, there was an elderly man, standing
alone, saying the mourner’s kaddish. Being polite, we asked for whom he was saying
it. He looked up and answered, “I am saying it for myself.”
“The second death. To think that you died
and no one would remember you. I wondered if this is why we tried so hard to
make our mark in America .
To be known. Think of how important celebrity has become… It’s as if we are
screaming: Notice me! Remember me! Yet the notoriety barely lasts. Names
quickly blur and in times are forgotten.[1]”
-------------------------------------------------
“And it came to pass in the days of Achashveirosh…
in those days when King Achashveirosh sat on his royal throne which was in
Shushan the capital. In the third year of his reign, he made a feast…”
The gemara[2] explains that Achashveirosh
made his grand feast in the third year of his reign when he felt that his monarchy
was secure[3]. The world was respectfully
aware that the prophet Jeremiah had prophesized[4] that the Babylonian exile
would only last seventy years, after which the Bais Hamikdash would be rebuilt.
Achashveirosh was frightened that when the Bais
Hamikdash would be rebuilt his kingdom would be disbanded. But in the third
year of his reign he was convinced that the seventy years had concluded and yet
the Temple had
not been rebuilt. He was overjoyed that Jeremiah’s prophecy was incorrect and
he was confident that his monarchy was secure.
The gemara explains that Achashveirosh was so
confident that the prophecy would not be fulfilled that at the party he donned
the Holy vestments of the High Priest which were looted from the Bais Hamikdash
prior to its destruction.
Seven years earlier the wicked Babylonian king
Belshazzar was also convinced that Jeremiah’s prophecy had been flawed[5]. To celebrate, he arranged a
tremendous feast during which he donned the Priestly garments. It was an act of
brazen sacrilege which no one had dared to do until then. His retribution came
swiftly. By morning he was dead, and his kingdom immediately invaded and
conquered, relegating the mighty Babylonian Empire to the history books.
Achashveirosh too did not go unpunished for his brazenness.
By the day’s end his beloved Queen Vashti - his only legitimate connection to
royalty[6] - was dead; a consequence of
his own inebriated fury.
It seems from the gemara’s discussion that
Achashveirosh and Belshazzar were only blameworthy because they had
miscalculated the seventy years. However, had they been correct in their
calculation they would not have been worthy of punishment. Why should the
status of the Priestly vestments be based on whether the seventy years were
over or not?
The gemara[7] rules that if a sanctified
rooster[8] ‘rebels’ by acting
erratically it forfeits its holy status. The commentaries question how a status
of holiness can be lost? Rashba explains that if an object’s holiness is based
on its value, it is tantamount to a monetary lien on the object[9]. But once the object ceases
to function as it should – in this case when the rooster began acting
erratically – the Temple
treasurer ‘gives up’ on his ability to collect the value of that rooster. Once
that occurs, the rooster has no market value, and it no longer possesses any
holy status.
With this in mind, Chavatzeles HaSharon[10] offers a fascinating explanation
of why the culpability of Achashveirosh and Belshazzar depended on whether the
seventy years of Jeremiah’s prophecy had indeed passed or not. If the seventy
years had concluded with the Temple
not being rebuilt, the Jews themselves would have despaired. Once that
occurred, the vestments of the High Priest would have lost their sanctified
status, no different than the rooster which loses its sanctified status when
the Temple
treasurer ‘gives-up’ on its possessing any value[11].
It is an intriguing concept. If the Jews would
have reached a level of despair, it would have had halachic ramifications
vis-à-vis the status of the holy clothing of the High Priest! The very feeling
of forfeiture would have transformed the holiest articles of clothing into
commonplace (though expensive) garments[12].
When the Torah recounts Amalek’s virulent attack
against Klal Yisroel in the desert the pasuk states[13], “He ambushed (vay’zanev)
all the stragglers (hanecheshalim) behind you, and you were tired and
weary, and did not fear G-d."
The commentaries explain that, although the Divine
Clouds enveloped and protected the nation, it did not harbor sinners. There
were iniquitous members from the tribe of Dan who were guilty of idolatry and
therefore did not merit the protection of the Clouds of Glory. It was to those
individuals who the Torah refers to as ‘the tired and weary’. Their weariness
was not physical but rather a spiritual fatigue which precluded them from the
Cloud’s protection. Amalek reasoned that since those Jews were rejected by the
Clouds, G-d had rejected them completely. They were sure that the nation would
never go to battle in defense of such sinners. Yet it was in their defense that
Moshe led the nation out to war in order to fight Amalek.
It is noteworthy that the Armageddon between Klal
Yisroel and Amalek began in defense of blatant sinners. The battle against
Amalek symbolized that no Jew is ever completely scorned by G-d. Even if a Jew
has committed sins which warrant his rejection from the community, he is never
rejected by G-d. G-d never gives up on any of His Children no matter how far
they stray. The holy spark within them is innate and eternal.
The gemara[14]
states that G-d commanded every Jew to contribute a half-Shekel tax in the
desert in order to proactively ward off the affect of the Shekalim that Haman
offered Achashveirosh as compensation for the genocide of the Jews during the
unfolding of the Purim story. Tosafos explains that Haman gave Achashveirosh
10,000 Kikar Kesef, which is equal to all of the half-shekel given by the
600,000 Jews that left Mitzrayim.[15]
When the Torah gives a
reckoning of the contributions to the Mishkan it says that the total amount
collected from the mandatory half-shekel tax was one hundred talents of silver.
That silver was used to construct the ninety-six silver sockets upon which the
forty-eight wooden boards surrounding the Mishkan rested.
However, there was still a
certain amount of silver remaining after the sockets were made. But Moshe could
not recall what that silver was used for. The scoffers immediately began
accusing Moshe of pocketing the excess silver. Their unfounded accusation caused
Moshe untold distress. Then finally the Divine Presence reminded Moshe that the
excess silver had been used to construct the hooks which held up the pillars.
“And from the one thousand seven hundred and seventy-five he made hooks for the pillars…[16]”
Why did Moshe forget about that remaining silver?
Rabbi Moshe Wolson shlita explained that the
silver contributed by the 600,000 Jews was used for the sockets. The remaining
3,550 Jews were sinners who were evicted from the main camp. The silver that
they contributed was not used for the sockets but was used for the hooks that
upheld the pillars. Because that silver was donated by those who were rejected
from the camp, Moshe could not recall what they were used for.[17]
Haman offered Achashveirosh 10,000 silver talents
to counterbalance the half-shekel that the 600,000 Jews gave in the desert. But
he did not offer more to counter the contributions of the remaining 3,550 Jews.
Haman, like his ancestor Amalek, was sure that the sinners were rejected and
were no longer counted with the rest of the nation. Therefore, he felt no need
to counter their contribution.
In fact, this was the logic behind Haman’s entire
diabolical plan. He was sure that if he could lure the Jews to sin by having
them participate in the party of Achashveirosh they would be rejected by G-d
and vulnerable to destruction[18].
But Amalek and Haman were severely mistaken. Every
Jew is beloved and precious, and that never changes.
One who would say kaddish for himself has given up
on himself and has allowed despondency and despair to overtake him. He may be
breathing but he is no longer alive for he has allowed his spirit of vibrancy to
wither.
Amalek was convinced that G-d would forsake
egregious sinners. The fact that we continue to wage war against our implacable
foe proves that no Jew - no matter how far he has strayed - is dispensable or
replaceable.
The holiday of Purim is the celebration of the
infinitesimal and innumerable value of every single Jew. Even when a Jew has
given up on himself he must know that His Creator will never give up on him.
“He ambushed the stragglers behind you”
“He made hooks for the pillars”
[1] “Have a little faith”, by
Mitch Albom.
[2] Megilla 11b
[3] It was in the year 3395 from
Creation
[4] Jeremiah 29:10
[5] He erred in his calculation
because he thought the seventy years began from when his father, King
Nebuchadnezzar, ascended the throne. Achashveirosh also erred in his
calculation because he too began the count prematurely. He reckoned that the
seventy years began when the Jewish King Yechoniah was exiled by Nebuchadnezzar
since that was when the exile first began. In truth, the calculation should
have begun from when the first Bais Hamikdash was destroyed in 3338. Indeed in
3408, seventy years after the first Temple
has been destroyed, King Darius, the son of Achashveirosh, permitted the
rebuilding of the Bais Hamikdash to commence.
[6] Achashveirosh himself possessed
no royal blood. He was a valiant general (Xerxes) who ruthlessly fought his way
to the throne. His only legitimacy lay in the fact that he married Vashti, a
Babylonian princess.
[7] Chullin 139a
[8] The rooster’s owner pledged the
value of the rooster to the Temple .
[9] There are two forms of holiness:
“Kedushas haguf” (literally ‘holy body’) which means the object was
infused with an intrinsic holiness, and “Kedushas Damim” (literally
‘holy value’) which means that the object itself has not become innately holy,
but rather its value is dedicated to the Temple treasury. Our discussion
involves an object that possesses the inferior level of Kedushas Damim.
[10] Rabbi Mordechai Carlebach shlita
[11] The Chavatzeles HaSharon then
debates whether the Priestly vestments indeed possessed only Kedushas Damim and
not Keushas Haguf.
[12] The only reason Belshazzar and
Achashveirosh were culpable is because they erroneously reckoned the seventy
years prematurely and the seventy years were not yet over.
[13] Devorim 25:17
[15] The commentaries seek to explain how the numbers add up. If
half a shekel for 600,000 Jews is 300,000 Shekalim, Haman's 10,000 Kikar is the
equivalent of 15 million shekel (A Kikar is 60 Mana and a Mana is 25
Shekel). It seems that Haman gave 25 times the amount of Shkalim that
Bnei Yisroel gave?
The Shnayim Mikra brings from the
Chizkuni that since a person lives 70 years, if one started contributing the
half-shekel at the age of 20, and continues to give for the next fifty years,
he will have given a total of 25 Shekel throughout his life. Thus Haman
did not only compensate for the one time contribution of the nation, but he
paid the equivalent a lifetime's worth for every single Jew.
See also Maharsha, Chizkuni to
Shemos 30:14, Vilna Gaon to Esther 3:9, Rav Tzadok Hakohain in Divrei
Sofrim (p. 84).
[16] Shemos 38:28
[17] Rabbi Wolson explained that all
materials donated to the Mishkan was used for the holy vessels or holy
courtyards. The only exception was these hooks. The hooks were used to hang the
curtains upon the outer courtyard walls. The curtains themselves represented
the outermost boundary of the inner elevated sanctuary. Therefore, the hooks
that upheld them and protruded outwards did not contain the level of sanctity
that the Mishkan had. However they were still ‘connected’. This was symbolic of
those who donated the silver for those hooks. They themselves may have been
‘cast out’ but they always remained connected.
[18] As noted Achashveirosh’s party
celebrated the fact that the Temple
would not be rebuilt. The Jews’ participation in that feast was a terrible
affront to G-d and to themselves!
0 comments:
Post a Comment